News
Crypto

Near Intents Blocks $50M in Bitget Hacker Swaps — What Traders Need to Know

CoinDesk September 30, 2026
Near Intents Blocks $50M in Bitget Hacker Swaps — What Traders Need to Know

Near Intents intercepted over $50 million in attempted swaps tied to the Bitget hacker, but most rejected funds later moved through other providers. Here's what happened and why it matters.

Share

VNIX Quick Take

  • Near Intents, a cross-chain swap service, identified and blocked more than $50 million in attempted transfers linked to the Bitget hacker.
  • Despite the block, the majority of the rejected funds subsequently moved through other providers, highlighting the cat-and-mouse nature of on-chain security.
  • For traders, the event underscores the importance of monitoring exchange security and understanding how stolen funds can still circulate via alternative routes.

Near Intents Blocks $50M in Bitget Hacker Swaps

Near Intents, a swap service that facilitates cross-chain transactions, recently announced that it successfully identified and blocked over $50 million in attempted swaps connected to the hacker behind the Bitget exchange breach. The service flagged the transfers as suspicious and rejected them, preventing the funds from being laundered through its platform.

However, the reprieve was short-lived: most of the rejected funds were subsequently routed through other providers, according to the source. This incident highlights the ongoing challenge of tracking and stopping stolen crypto, even when one service acts responsibly.

The Bitget hack, which occurred earlier, resulted in the loss of a significant amount of digital assets. While the exact figure has not been disclosed in the source, the $50 million blocked by Near Intents represents a substantial portion of the stolen funds. The hacker's attempt to swap these assets indicates a desire to obfuscate the origin of the funds, a common tactic in crypto theft.

How the Hacker Tried to Launder Funds Through Near Intents

The Role of Cross-Chain Swap Services

Cross-chain swap services like Near Intents allow users to exchange assets across different blockchains without relying on a centralized exchange. These services are popular for their speed and low fees, but they can also be exploited by bad actors seeking to move illicit funds. Near Intents uses advanced monitoring tools to detect suspicious activity, which is how it caught the Bitget hacker's transfers. For traders, understanding these services is part of grasping the broader crypto security landscape.

Why Rejected Funds Still Moved Elsewhere

The fact that most rejected funds moved through other providers suggests that the hacker had alternative routes prepared. This could involve other swap services with less stringent checks or decentralized exchanges that do not require identity verification. It also points to the fragmented nature of crypto security: while one platform may block a transaction, others may not. This cat-and-mouse dynamic is a key risk factor for exchanges and traders alike. Keeping an eye on on-chain indicators can help traders gauge market sentiment and potential risks.

Key Levels and Assets to Watch After the Bitget Hack

Following the Bitget hack, traders should monitor the price action of assets that were stolen, as large liquidations or swaps can impact market prices. Additionally, watch for any announcements from Bitget regarding reimbursements or security upgrades. The exchange's native token, if any, could see volatility. As always, keep an eye on real-time prices to stay informed.

From a technical perspective, key support and resistance levels for major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum may come into play if the hacker's actions trigger sell pressure. However, it's important to note that the $50 million blocked is a fraction of the total daily trading volume, so the immediate market impact may be limited.

What This Means for Traders and the Crypto Ecosystem

This incident serves as a reminder that crypto security is a shared responsibility. Exchanges must continually upgrade their defenses, and swap services must maintain robust monitoring. For traders, it's crucial to choose platforms with strong security track records and to stay informed about ongoing threats. Diversifying across multiple exchanges and using hardware wallets can mitigate risks.

Moreover, the event highlights the importance of transparency. Near Intents' decision to publicly disclose the blocked transfers sets a positive example, but it also reveals the limitations of individual efforts. Collaborative industry-wide solutions, such as shared blacklists of flagged addresses, could be more effective. Traders can contribute by reporting suspicious activity and participating in community discussions on trading forums.

From a trading perspective, such news can create short-term volatility, especially if it leads to a loss of confidence in a particular exchange. However, the broader market has shown resilience to isolated hacks. Traders should focus on fundamental factors and avoid knee-jerk reactions. If you're new to trading, consider taking our trader quiz to understand your risk profile.

In VNIX's view

Near Intents' successful block of $50 million in hacker funds is a commendable effort, but the fact that most funds still moved elsewhere underscores the need for a more unified approach to crypto security. Traders should view this as a reminder to prioritize security and stay vigilant, rather than as a direct market signal. The incident is unlikely to have a lasting impact on prices, but it does reinforce the importance of due diligence when choosing where to trade.

Educational analysis, not financial advice. Trading involves risk.

Get real-time trade signals

Entry, target and stop-loss for gold, crypto and forex — curated by our team.

Join Signal Rooms

Frequently asked questions

What is Near Intents and how did it block the Bitget hacker?
Near Intents is a cross-chain swap service that detected and rejected over $50 million in attempted transfers linked to the Bitget hacker, using advanced monitoring tools to flag suspicious activity.
Why did the rejected funds still move through other providers?
The hacker likely had alternative routes prepared, using other swap services or decentralized exchanges with less stringent checks, highlighting the fragmented nature of crypto security.
How can traders protect themselves from similar exchange hacks?
Traders should use reputable exchanges with strong security, enable two-factor authentication, and consider storing assets in hardware wallets. Staying informed through resources like VNIX Classroom can also help.